Life Safety First
Protect people before property, data, schedules, equipment, or financial interests.
The JR Institute intends to prepare for emergencies, maintain critical operations, protect research and records, restore technology and facilities, and learn from every incident.
This page presents a planned public standard. Final emergency plans, continuity priorities, communications systems, recovery objectives, alternate sites, and leadership assignments should be approved and tested before active operations.
Severe weather, fire, utility failure, cyberattack, public-health events, hazardous releases, equipment loss, transportation disruption, or facility damage can interrupt critical work without warning.
The Institute should know what must continue, what can pause, who has authority, how people will communicate, and how systems will be restored safely.
Protect people before property, data, schedules, equipment, or financial interests.
Define who leads, who communicates, who approves shutdowns, and who coordinates recovery.
Identify services, systems, facilities, records, and research activities that cannot remain unavailable.
Build backup power, communications, data, suppliers, locations, and personnel into essential operations.
Verify that backups, procedures, contact lists, alternate facilities, and recovery systems actually work.
Review drills and incidents, correct weaknesses, and update plans as conditions change.
This policy is intended to apply to emergencies and disruptions affecting people, facilities, laboratories, field operations, technology, communications, transportation, utilities, vendors, research, records, and public services.
Emergency plans should define leadership roles, succession, activation thresholds, emergency spending authority, shutdown authority, liaison responsibilities, and coordination with public responders.
Roles should remain clear when senior leaders are unavailable, off site, or directly affected by the event.
The Institute should maintain redundant methods for warning, instruction, status reporting, family communication, public information, and coordination with staff, trustees, partners, vendors, and authorities.
Facilities should have procedures for evacuation, shelter-in-place, lockdown, assembly, accountability, assistance for people with disabilities, and controlled reentry.
No person should reenter a restricted area to recover equipment, animals, records, or personal property unless authorized by emergency leadership.
Each major function should identify:
Continuity plans should address experiments, samples, specimens, freezers, environmental controls, animals, archives, participant contact, regulated materials, and time-sensitive observations.
Plans should define what must be stabilized, transferred, monitored remotely, backed up, safely terminated, or restarted only after review.
Technology plans should define recovery priorities, backup locations, restoration procedures, identity management, communications, cybersecurity response, and validation before systems return to service.
Recovery-time and recovery-point objectives should reflect the importance of each system and the consequences of data loss or extended outage.
Plans should address power, generators, fuel, water, heating, cooling, ventilation, fire protection, communications, elevators, access control, structural safety, and hazardous systems.
Alternate work locations and temporary operations should be evaluated for safety, security, accessibility, technology, insurance, and suitability for the intended activity.
Critical suppliers should be identified with alternate sources where practical. Contracts may require continuity plans, emergency contacts, service priorities, data recovery, incident notification, and transition assistance.
The Institute should test emergency and continuity plans through drills, tabletop exercises, technical recovery tests, and facility simulations.
After incidents or exercises, responsible personnel should document what occurred, what worked, what failed, what remains unresolved, and who is accountable for corrective action.
Framework date: July 2026
Inquiries may concern emergency communications, evacuation, alternate sites, technology recovery, research continuity, utilities, vendors, or post-incident corrective action.
Identify the facility, system, function, hazard, date, continuity concern, and available supporting information.
Contact the Institute