Published Service Scope
Explain which functions are supported, monitored, and considered essential.
The JR Institute intends to operate its future repository with defined service expectations, planned maintenance procedures, incident priorities, timely public updates, and continuity measures for extended disruption.
This page presents a planned public standard. Final availability objectives, maintenance windows, incident severity levels, communication channels, recovery targets, and support responsibilities should be approved before repository launch.
Authors and readers need to know when submissions, identifiers, downloads, moderation, search, or public records are unavailable or operating in a degraded state.
The Institute should communicate material disruptions without exposing security-sensitive details or making promises that cannot be supported.
Explain which functions are supported, monitored, and considered essential.
Schedule disruptive work, give advance notice, and identify expected impact.
Restore safety, record integrity, identifiers, access, and submissions in a defined order.
Communicate material outages, degraded service, recovery progress, and restoration.
Adjust repository-controlled deadlines when service disruption prevents timely action.
Document causes, impact, corrective action, and unresolved risks after major incidents.
This policy is intended to apply to repository browsing, search, downloads, identifiers, submissions, moderation tools, APIs, metadata feeds, authentication, preservation systems, administrative functions, and public incident communication.
The Institute should publish realistic service objectives for essential repository functions without presenting them as absolute guarantees.
Objectives may address public availability, identifier resolution, submission access, support response, backup completion, recovery, and preservation monitoring.
Maintenance that may interrupt service should be scheduled during an appropriate window and announced with reasonable advance notice.
Planned maintenance may still change when testing reveals added risk. Updated estimates should replace silent delay.
Incidents should be classified according to impact on safety, confidentiality, scholarly-record integrity, availability, submissions, identifiers, preservation, and affected users.
Severity should guide escalation, staffing, communication frequency, executive notification, and external support.
Recovery should ordinarily prioritize:
Material disruptions should be communicated through a designated status channel separate from the affected service where practical.
Notices should identify affected functions, known impact, current mitigation, expected next update, and restoration status without revealing details that increase security risk.
Repository-controlled deadlines should be extended or treated flexibly when a verified service interruption prevents submission, revision, response, appeal, or required access.
Queue order and timestamps should be preserved as fairly as practical after service restoration.
Extended outages may require read-only operation, alternate submission channels, static record mirrors, manual identifier support, reduced services, or transfer to temporary infrastructure.
Temporary continuity systems should preserve security, record integrity, timestamps, authorship, and later reconciliation with the primary repository.
Major incidents should receive a documented review of timeline, cause, impact, decisions, communication, recovery, evidence, control failures, and corrective action.
Public summaries should be released when they provide accountability without compromising security, privacy, legal obligations, or unresolved investigation.
The Institute should report service availability, material outages, recovery performance, maintenance impact, unresolved risks, and major continuity improvements.
Metric definitions and exclusions should remain consistent enough for meaningful comparison over time.
Framework date: July 2026
Inquiries may concern planned maintenance, unavailable records, identifier failures, submission interruptions, accessibility, restoration, status communication, or post-incident review.
Identify the affected function, date and time, observed behavior, record or account involved, urgency, and available technical details.
Contact the Institute