Research Priorities
Review the Institute’s principal areas of intended focus and the criteria used to select future research.
Review research prioritiesA central guide to the Institute’s developing research policies, review pathways, data standards, publication resources, collaboration procedures, repository guidance, and responsible research practices.
The Institute intends to support researchers through clear guidance, consistent review processes, practical templates, secure systems, scholarly communication resources, and access to institutional expertise.
Resources for developing a research question, defining scope, identifying collaborators, and preparing for review.
Review the Institute’s principal areas of intended focus and the criteria used to select future research.
Review research prioritiesExplore proposed, developing, active, and future projects across the Institute’s six research fields.
View the project portfolioLearn about proposed research centers, laboratories, shared infrastructure, and activation requirements.
Explore research infrastructureSubmit an initial inquiry involving joint research, data, facilities, field sites, archives, or implementation.
Review proposal guidanceReview expectations for grants, budgets, reporting, financial controls, and sponsored research administration.
Review the grant policyUnderstand disclosure, review, management, and recusal requirements for financial and professional interests.
Review conflict standardsPolicies governing participant protection, research integrity, misconduct review, animals, biosafety, and responsible scholarly conduct.
The Institute’s central framework for honest, responsible, transparent, and accountable research.
Review the integrity frameworkRequirements for informed consent, risk review, privacy, vulnerable populations, and responsible human research.
Review human-subject protectionsStandards for necessity, humane care, alternatives, oversight, veterinary support, and approved research use.
Review animal-care standardsProcedures for allegations, preliminary assessment, inquiry, investigation, findings, correction, and appeal.
Review misconduct proceduresGuidance for contributor roles, attribution, ghostwriting, conflicts, duplicate publication, and corrections.
Review authorship standardsStandards supporting fair review, editorial autonomy, reviewer conduct, confidentiality, and scholarly quality.
Review editorial standardsResources for planning, collecting, securing, documenting, analyzing, preserving, sharing, and reproducing research.
Standards for data-management plans, version control, documentation, reproducibility, sharing, and preservation.
Review data and software standardsRequirements for access control, sensitive information, vendors, security, incident response, and institutional data.
Review data governanceGuidance for durable formats, integrity checking, backups, migration, repository continuity, and long-term access.
Review preservation standardsStandards for metadata quality, persistent identifiers, author identity, indexing, citations, and discoverability.
Review metadata standardsGuidance for inventions, software, data, licenses, technology transfer, background rights, and public benefit.
Review intellectual-property policyStandards for public access, author rights, licenses, scholarly reuse, embargoes, and responsible distribution.
Review open-access standardsGuidance for authors, reviewers, editors, contributors, and researchers preparing work for public dissemination.
Explore reports, papers, briefs, books, research notes, and other Institute scholarly and public-facing output.
Visit PublicationsReview expectations concerning originality, authorship, conflicts, citations, corrections, and responsible claims.
Review publication ethicsGuidance for reviewer selection, confidentiality, independence, fairness, conflicts, and editorial decisions.
Review peer-review standardsRepository policies and technical guidance for submissions, moderation, metadata, file standards, preservation, access, and service continuity.
Learn about the Institute’s developing scholarly repository, collections, services, and public mission.
Visit the archiveReview submission eligibility, moderation principles, repository governance, and record-management expectations.
Review submission governanceGuidance for document formats, supplemental files, technical validation, accessibility, integrity, and uploads.
Review file standardsLearn how records may be organized, assigned to subjects, curated, reclassified, and connected across collections.
Review curation standardsStandards for human and automated access, bulk use, security, rate limits, scraping, and responsible conduct.
Review acceptable useProcedures for legal requests, privacy claims, restricted records, rights disputes, and temporary or permanent access limits.
Review takedown proceduresSpecialized requirements for laboratories, facilities, international work, field operations, and secure systems.
Standards for biological materials, containment, training, security, incident response, and responsible research.
Review biosafety standardsGuidance for hazardous materials, radiation, equipment, waste, exposure prevention, emergency response, and training.
Review laboratory safetyRequirements for controlled technology, international partners, travel, visitors, disclosures, and research security.
Review research-security standardsStandards for facility access, credentials, restricted areas, visitors, assets, security systems, and emergency controls.
Review facility standardsGuidance for fleet, aviation, marine, field travel, operator qualifications, maintenance, insurance, and incidents.
Review transportation safetyStandards for emergency planning, continuity, backups, communication, recovery priorities, and institutional resilience.
Review continuity standardsResources for researchers working with external institutions, sponsors, communities, vendors, and implementation partners.
Learn about institutional partnerships involving universities, agencies, companies, foundations, and communities.
Explore partnershipsReview what to include in an initial research collaboration, field-site, data, or infrastructure proposal.
Prepare an inquiryStandards for purchasing, competition, due diligence, contracts, conflicts, performance, and vendor oversight.
Review procurement standardsA high-level checklist for determining whether a project is prepared to move from concept toward formal review.
The problem, objective, expected contribution, and intended public or scholarly value are clearly defined.
The principal investigator, collaborators, staff, decision authority, responsibilities, and supervision are identified.
The study design, methods, data sources, analytical approach, limitations, and quality controls are documented.
Human, animal, community, privacy, consent, vulnerability, and fairness considerations have been assessed.
Laboratory, field, facility, cybersecurity, export-control, transportation, and emergency risks have been reviewed.
Collection, access, storage, security, metadata, analysis, sharing, retention, and preservation plans are established.
Personnel, equipment, facilities, funding, procurement, insurance, and operational support are realistically addressed.
Authorship, intellectual property, publication, repository, correction, and public communication expectations are defined.
Contact the Institute with a brief description of the proposed project, participants, methods, data, facilities, collaborators, and the kind of guidance or review needed.